A Framework for Evaluating National Cybersecurity Strategies

As governments seek to confront today's complex and evolving threat landscape, they are experimenting with distinct approaches to safeguarding their national cybersecurity. This project compares a dozen key countries' national cybersecurity strategies in order to determine the most effective and innovative policy approaches that should inform global standards. The countries assessed include the US, China, the UK, Germany, South Korea, Singapore, the UAE, and Australia, among others. Having closely analyzed each strategy document and interviewed more than 20 officials and non-government experts representing all countries included in the study, we employ a two-dimensional framework to evaluate the strategies alongside one another against a 67-point rubric with an eye toward identifying leaders, innovators, and under-performers in each category. We also consider external factors that make each strategy unique, such as a given country's political context and threat environment. Our paper offers a top-line scorecard for each country in the study, documenting the strengths and weaknesses of its approach, and highlighting ten policies that should serve as global standards. We issue tailored recommendations for each country, noting specific gaps in need of remediation and opportunities for policy improvement. We also emphasize the importance of preparing to counter emerging threats created by generative artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and other technologies. The ultimate goal of the paper is to offer guidance to help practitioners develop more robust cybersecurity strategies in the future and a template for strategists in countries that have yet to create one. By: Fred Heiding | Research Fellow, Harvard Alex O'Neill | Independet Lachlan Price | Research Assistant, Harvard Eric Rosenbach | Senior Lecturer in Public Policy, Harvard Full Abstract & Presentation Materials: https://ift.tt/1iAjVpq

source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3KKYD0JPcc